Privacy is not in the Constitution. But it’s everywhere in constitutional law.

Almost all American adults — including parents, medical patients, and sexually active people — regularly exercise their right to privacy, even if they don’t know it.

Confidentiality is not specifically mentioned in the United States Constitution. But for half a century, the Supreme Court has recognized it as an outgrowth of individual liberty protections. As I studied in my to research on constitutional privacy rightsthis implied right to privacy is the source of many of the country’s most cherished, controversial and commonly used rights, including the right to have an abortion.

A key element of freedom

The Supreme Court first formally identified what is called “decision-making confidentiality– the right to independently control the most personal aspects of our lives and bodies – in 1965, saying it was implicit other explicit constitutional rights.

For example, the First Amendment the rights of speech and assembly allow people to decide in private what they will say and with whom they will associate. The Fourth Amendment limits government intrusion into people’s private property, documents and assets.

Relying on these explicit provisions, the tribunal concluded in Griswold v. Connecticut that people have privacy rights preventing the government from banning married couples from using contraception.

In a short time, the court clarified its understanding of the constitutional origins of privacy. In Roe v. Wade of 1973 protecting the right to have a Abortion, the court held that the right to adjudicative confidentiality is grounded in the Constitution’s assurance that people cannot be “deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process.” This sentence, called the due process clause, appears twice in the Constitution – in the Fifth and 14th amendments.

The confidentiality of decisions has also served as the basis for other decisions protecting many crucial and daily activities.

The right to privacy protects the ability to have consensual sex without being sent to prison. And privacy strengthens the possibility of getting married regardless of race or gender.

The right to privacy is also essential to a person’s ability to keep their family together without undue government interference. For example, in 1977, the court relied on the right to private and family life to decide that a grandmother could move her grandchildren into her house to raise them even if it violated a local zoning ordinance.

Under a combination of privacy and liberty rights, the Supreme Court also protected a person’s freedom in making medical decisions. For example, in 1990 the court found “that a competent person has constitutionally protected right to liberty refusing unwanted medical treatment.

Limit government disclosure

The right to decision-making secrecy is not the only form of privacy protected by the Constitution. As then-Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist noted in 1977the “concept of ‘privacy’ can be a coat of many colors, and different types of ‘privacy’ rights have been recognized in law.”

This includes what is called a right to “information privacy” – allowing a person to limit government disclosure of information about them.

According to some authorities, the right extends even to prominent public and political figures. In a landmark 1977 decision, Chief Justice Warren Burger and Rehnquist – both conservative judges – suggested in dissenting opinions that former President Richard Nixon had an interest in protecting the privacy of documents written during his presidency that touched on his personal life. Lower courts relied on the right to privacy of information to limit the government’s ability to disclose a person’s sexual orientation or HIV status.

All in all, although the word is not in the Constitution, privacy is the foundation of many constitutional protections for our most important, sensitive and intimate activities. If the right to privacy is eroded – as in a future Supreme Court decision – many of the rights to which it is linked could also be in jeopardy.

Scott Skinner-Thompson is an associate professor of law at the University of Colorado at Boulder.

The conversation was born out of deep concern about the diminishing quality of our public discourse and recognition of the vital role that academic experts could play in the public arena. Information has always been essential to democracy. It is a social good, like drinking water. But many now find it hard to trust the media and experts who have spent years researching a topic. Instead, they listen to those with the loudest voices. These uninformed views are amplified by social media that rewards those who spark outrage instead of thoughtful insight or discussion. The Conversation seeks to be part of the solution to this problem, to bring the voices of real experts to the table and make their knowledge available to everyone. The Conversation publishes nightly at 9 p.m. on FlaglerLive.

Previous chats:
  • The long and august history of tattoo meanings
  • Millions of unemployed are set to suffer far more as benefits run out
  • Buried power lines are not fail safe
  • Behind Hurricane Ida’s Record Rainfall in New York and the Northeast: Yes, It’s Global Warming
  • When human life begins is a matter of politics, not biology
  • How Warm Gulf Patch Quickly Turned Hurricane Ida Into A Monstrous Storm
  • Is it a crime to tamper with a vaccine card?
  • This is what happens to migrant children at the border
  • The story of the women behind the first shelters for victims of domestic violence
  • The Supreme Court ended the eviction ban. Now what? 4 questions answered.
  • ISIS-K, the rival Taliban group behind the Kabul airport attack
  • Clues to misinformation behind misuse of vaccine database by public and right-wing media
  • Essential and Often Overlooked: Employees of American Public Libraries
  • Behind the Federal Government’s Tesla Investigation and the Future of Self-Driving Cars
  • The meaning of happiness from the ashes of Pompeii
  • Ashura Explained: The Shia Muslim Holiday That Inspires Millions
  • You are free to refuse the Covid vaccine. But it’s un-American.
  • Why I don’t think we can eliminate Covid anymore
  • Schools and Covid safety: what works and what doesn’t
  • Afghanistan and American Pride
  • Social justice starts with an honest story
  • Afghanistan has always been a losing battle
  • Wonder and Promise of the Appalachian Trail
  • Holocaust survivors have obtained reparations. Why not the descendants of slavery?
  • The huge sums of tax that religious organizations do not pay
  • Don’t be too quick to claim voter suppression
  • Millions of American workers still cannot afford food and rent
  • Understanding the terrible warnings of the IPCC climate report
  • Palestinians and Israelis, human rights and another great compromise
  • Cults and Cultism
  • Prediction of an atomic bomb exploded long before Hiroshima
  • Changing Crime Reporting Practices to Do Less Harm
  • When Americans remember their roots, they open up to immigration
  • Where Canadian Dads Are Warm, Kind, and Sweet, American Dads Punish Hard and Lack Emotional Support
  • Trump’s endorsements make a difference, but not the way candidates hope
  • Is it time to retire the slogan “My body, my choice”?
  • Narcissists
  • How this summer is changing our understanding of extreme weather
  • A cautionary tale for coastal cities: what Miami’s seawall won’t protect
  • Here’s why you should hide indoors again, even if you’re vaccinated
  • Can we undo “Undo Culture”?
  • Ghostly, Soulless, Absurd Olympics
  • Behind Cuba’s Mass Protests: Covid Misery and US Economic Sanctions
  • The bias is natural. How you handle it defines your ability to be fair.
  • Why Some Young Evangelicals Are Abandoning the Faith
  • The racism inherent in the anti-vaxx movements
  • 63% of workers who file an EEOC discrimination complaint lose their jobs
  • Behind Ben & Jerry’s decision in the West Bank: Israel is losing the battle of public opinion
  • Domestic violence 911 calls increased during lockdown, but police reports and arrests decreased
  • Yes, Covid can cause infertility and sexual dysfunction. But vaccines cannot.
  • Is Islamophobia Hate Speech?
  • The seduction of propaganda
  • Ignoraunce Incarno: The Misguided Calls to Cancel Chaucer
  • Most Covid deaths in England are now among the vaccinated. Here’s why it shouldn’t alarm you
  • The risk of flooding at high tide will increase 5-15 times over the next 15 years, putting coastal economies at risk
  • Protests in Cuba: 4 essential readings on dissent in the post-Castro era
  • Zaila Vanguard, 2021 National Spelling Champion, stands where black children were once kept out
  • Trump before Trump: When Nixon’s VP Spiro Agnew attacked the media
  • Five lessons for bringing truth back to politics
  • Yes, states got more money from Washington than they needed for Covid Relief
  • Trump can’t beat Facebook, Twitter and YouTube in court, but the fight could be worth more money than a win
  • Should Supreme Court justices have term limits?
  • Critical Race Theory: What It Is and What, Governor DeSantis, It Isn’t
  • Debate over weightlifter Laurel Hubbard, 1st transgender woman in individual sports at the Olympics
  • With Bill Cosby’s backing, Phylicia Rashad becomes one of many struggling deans to tweet herself

View the full conversation archive